Microsoft Goes to School: You’re An Evil Predator; Now Teach My Kids

by | Nov 23, 2001 | Antitrust & Monopolies, Education, POLITICS

The settlement of the Microsoft anti-trust case got interesting this week — and developments revealed the laughably absurd nature of much of the suit against the company. Reports in the Wall Street Journal and the Los Angeles Times and elsewhere revealed that Mister Softee will “give $1 billion worth of software and related goods and […]

The settlement of the Microsoft anti-trust case got interesting this week — and developments revealed the laughably absurd nature of much of the suit against the company. Reports in the Wall Street Journal and the Los Angeles Times and elsewhere revealed that Mister Softee will “give $1 billion worth of software and related goods and services to needy schools” as part of its settlement.

First the lawyers vilified the Redmond behemoth for years, labeling it a predatory, monopolistic cancer unfit to do business. Now these lawyers want the company’s goodies in order to distribute them to little school kids. Go figure.

Actually, not all the lawyers are thrilled. Some of them hate the idea and are howling mad about it. The most revealing cries came from the tempestuous California Attorney General Bill Lockyer who is furious with the emerging settlement terms. “It’s a little like Big Tobacco being found guilty of selling cigarettes to minors, and the remedy is for them to agree to give them free cigarettes,” Lockyer said.

To Lockyer and other predatory AG’s and their trial lawyer allies, Microsoft is not a multi-billion dollar global company that creates products that millions of people around the world love and use every day. It’s just a poisonous monster that needs to be laid low. This is precisely the sort of arrogance that led to Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson’s public spanking as his order to break up the company was vacated. Will they ever learn?

One good feature of the settlement: the fees for the trial lawyers won’t be tied to the size of the settlement as is often the case in big class-action cases. The judge will determine the fees for the lawyers. This is a good sign.

Nick Schulz is an editor at Tech Central Station.

The views expressed represent those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors & publishers of Capitalism Magazine.

Capitalism Magazine often publishes articles we disagree with because we believe the article provides information, or a contrasting point of view, that may be of value to our readers.

Related articles

Zohran Mamdani’s “Democratic Socialist” Plans For New York City

Zohran Mamdani’s “Democratic Socialist” Plans For New York City

New York’s future does not lie in further centralization or state control. Its vitality has always derived from individual freedom, entrepreneurial energy, and the rule of law. The Big Apple became great because it allowed people to build, innovate, and prosper—not because government directed them.

Five Myths About Tariffs

Five Myths About Tariffs

Tariffs distort market signals that would otherwise lower costs, raise competition, and motivate reinvestment.

The Myth of The Medicare “Trust Fund”

The Myth of The Medicare “Trust Fund”

Using the phrase “Medicare’s trust fund” for any reason other than exposing its falsehood is grossly misleading. It implies there’s a pot of money available to fund Medicare, when no such pot exists.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pin It on Pinterest