Middle East & Israel

Here’s the speech that President Donald Trump ought to deliver in a nationally televised address.

Privately, many of them want Washington and Jerusalem to keep going until Iran can no longer threaten their lifelines. Publicly, they speak the language of appeasement, international law, and de-escalation. They want the result, but not the responsibility.

Trump’s Gaza approach reflects what successful deal-makers grasp intuitively: strategic pressure paired with targeted action against genuine threats like Iran’s nuclear program can compel adversaries to negotiate without committing American forces to occupation.

Why the claim equals Holocaust denial.

The decision by the Israeli government to make significant concessions to the Hamas kidnappers should never be called a “deal.” It was an extortion.

This may be the first time in military history that leaders have admitted putting their own people in harm’s way to increase the casualty figures.

Instead of Swastikas, they are wearing Keffiyehs.

Protests for Gaza is merely an excuse for a much wider agenda: to destroy Israel and destroy America.

Despite being militarily superior, however, Israel chose not to defeat Hamas, but only to degrade its capabilities. Repeatedly. The October 7 war is in part a result of this tragic pattern.

All in all, the number of absolutely innocent Gazans — babies, children and adults who are not complicit in Hamas crimes — is a fraction of those claimed by Israel’s enemies, including so-called human rights groups.

Why Is Biden Stopping Israel From Attacking Iran’s Nuclear Weapons Program?

Israel must realise that this is a golden opportunity that it cannot afford not to realise. It’s either now or in a year or two with a nuclear Iran. The ball is in Israel’s court.

Unless the Biden administration changes course and encourages Israel to achieve its legitimate military goal of defeating Hamas, terrorism will win and civilization will lose.

Hamas knew that by crossing into Israel and murdering, raping and kidnapping its civilians, it was signing a death warrant for many Gazan civilians whom Hamas intended to use as human shields.

Accusing Israel of ‘Genocide’ Reflects, at Best, Ignorance of the Term’s Meaning and, at Worst, Complicity With Hamas Terrorists.

To sacrifice victory in order to placate the civilians of Gaza, or to reduce criticism of Israel from the biased international community, academia or the media, would be wrong, both morally and strategically.

Either you support Israel’s right to defend itself, or you don’t. You can’t have both.

The new Israeli-Hamas war is David vs. Goliath all over again.

From its beginning, the Arab-Israeli conflict was a war between civilization and barbarism.