What drives Muslims to want to settle in countries that are Dar al-Harb (the enemy’s land) or Dar al-Kufr (land of unbelief)? What makes them want to live among the infidels?
Americans must first extricate themselves from the claws of statism before they can begin to credibly address peripheral issues such as immigration.
What happens when the immigrant does that, goes to the U.S. embassy and says, I’d like to work in America legally?
The bottom line is that much of the Muslim world is at war with Western civilization. There’s no question that the West has the military might to thwart radical Islam’s agenda. The question up for grabs is whether we have the intelligence to recognize the attack and the will to defend ourselves from annihilation.
A child can be years behind schedule in beginning to speak and yet go on to have a perfectly normal life.
Dr. Yaron Brook, president of the Ayn Rand Center for Individual Rights, calls for an open immigration policy, saying that the government’s only function should be to protect individual rights.
By appeasing the protestors, the first moral principles the Sainsbury’s manager conceded was the right to liberty.
It is fine to discuss a philosophy of freedom. But discussing it also requires a good, hard look at the political realities that negate any chance of freedom in the near future.
As I quickly walked away, I did not want to look back at its towers, battered and bearing the scars of its evil attackers. I do not want to remember the WTC burning or falling, for that was not its essence.
Fifty years of increasing American appeasement in the Mideast have led to fifty years of increasing contempt in the Muslim world for the U.S. The climax was September 11, 2001.
The attackers hate the West because the West brings prosperity.
To argue that foreign takeovers of Canadian companies are of “no net benefit” is nonsensical.