Murthy v. Missouri: The U.S. Supreme Court Green-Lights Censorship
The majority opinion here has found a way to codify this new form of censorship that threatens the whole idea of free speech itself.
The majority opinion here has found a way to codify this new form of censorship that threatens the whole idea of free speech itself.
There is nothing in the Constitution about a vast army of bureaucrats who rule behind the scenes that is in no way reachable or manageable by elected representatives.
Mr. Trump isn’t the only victim of this ill-advised gag order. It violates your First Amendment rights and mine as well.
To reduce the administrative state, Congress would need to unwind or revise many of the interventionist statutes it has passed over the decades.
The only reason that Ireland, Norway and Spain can safely recognize a Palestinian state is that they do not have to live with the consequences.
Judge Merchan has many sentencing options. We would not venture to predict which one he will select, though we are fairly certain, based on his trial rulings, that he will not be motivated by fairness or justice, but rather by the “get Trump” attitude that has dominated this case from beginning to end.
Americans should ask protectionists such as Donald Trump and Josh Hawley just how America is put ‘first’ by US government trade barriers that constrict ordinary Americans’ freedom to spend their incomes as they choose.
The 1936 Robinson-Patman Act (RPA), once a lynchpin of antitrust enforcement actions, because the government almost always won under its convoluted terms, has been all-but abandoned for decades.
Trump’s proposed reform would make the Fed an arm of the White House. It would be a step in the wrong direction.