Working For Change

by Sylvia Bokor | Mar 1, 2011

CREDO is the name of a political activist organization that has replaced ACORN.It has an nice web site---www.workingforchange.com. Using only black and a soft blue-green pastel, it looks fresh and clean and invites easy reading without many distracting colors, boxes and bars. The layout is simple and easily navigated, the content is provided in a […]

CREDO is the name of a political activist organization that has replaced ACORN.

It has an nice web site—www.workingforchange.com. Using only black and a soft blue-green pastel, it looks fresh and clean and invites easy reading without many distracting colors, boxes and bars. The layout is simple and easily navigated, the content is provided in a good size font easy to read.

On the left side of the site is a list of current events with brief paragraphs stating what CREDO is against or for, and includes admonitions to take various actions. On the right side of the site is a feature entitled “Mobile CREDO.”

Here’s an overview of some of the “issues” on the site. The lead paragraph links to a blog entitled “Praying for Palin.” The blog post is a sanctimoniously cowardly attack blaming Mrs. Palin for the Tucson shooting. The site writer then hops to filibuster reform, then abortion, then declares that “We must put a stop to the escalating hate rhetoric of the right and its very specific calls to armed violent act.” Then back to filibuster reform, to the riots in Egypt, to bashing John Boehner and the Tea parties. Next it’s the Koch brothers “and their Tea Party funding cabal,” then over to “U.S. evangelicals spreading hate in Uganda,” and on to the Chamber of Commerce. And so forth and so on.

The funniest statement on this site is the charge that Ayn Rand “secretly applied for Medicare and Social Security.” The statement is, of course, merely the writer’s public announcement of the absence of gray matter between his own ears.

The Left’s “argument” boils down to the claim that those who were forced to pay into a system over which they had no say and no control may not request return of their money in the form of Social Security payments, nor seek redress of funds through Medicare. In other words, the robbed has no right to request a return of his money from the robber.

To the Leftists, to want your money back “contradicts” your view that Social Security and government health care is wrong. That point of view certainly squares with Leftist’s philosophy, which is that only those who did not pay into the system should be given government money.

As in almost everything else, Leftists do not have a grasp of principles. Their frantic demand to be taken care of has caused in them a serious break with reality. The extent of that break is evident in CREDO’s harangues to run from “crisis” to “crisis.” Let them.

Meanwhile, those of us who advocate individual rights, limited government and free-markets will make significant strides. How? By showing people how capitalism works, and that it is for them as individuals—not as a nest of ants.

Sylvia Bokor is an artist and writer. You can read more of her writings on her blog.

The views represent those of the author and not necessarily those of Capitalism Magazine.

RELATED ARTICLES

Blaming Patents Won’t Lower Drug Prices

Blaming Patents Won’t Lower Drug Prices

Congress is considering a bill that could deter billions of dollars of medical research investments, undermining U.S. global leadership as a healthcare innovator and harming U.S. patients That’s not Congress’s intent, of course. Lawmakers are trying to fix perceived...

Intersectionality vs. American Individualism

Intersectionality vs. American Individualism

True Justice and real progress cannot be achieved by the false doctrine of “intersectionality” but only by the further application of America’s heritage of individualism and individual rights.