The Purpose of the Draft is Not a Strong Military

by | Sep 12, 2002 | Military, POLITICS

Senior military officers are opposing bringing back the military draft. They point out that today’s military is so high-tech and complex that an all-volunteer, trained force is superior. For years, in fact, many military leaders have observed that motivated recruits are better than what amounts to slave labor. This won’t be enough to convince fervent […]

Senior military officers are opposing bringing back the military draft. They point out that today’s military is so high-tech and complex that an all-volunteer, trained force is superior. For years, in fact, many military leaders have observed that motivated recruits are better than what amounts to slave labor.

This won’t be enough to convince fervent advocates of the draft. It’s not really a strong military that such people want. Many of them (at least on the liberal side) are opposed to a strong military, in fact. What they really seek is “national service,” and though they don’t like the military they’ll take it any way they can get it. They can’t tolerate the idea of “too much” freedom, and they love to exploit our current military crisis by using it as an opportunity to turn young people into slaves.

Hopefully, Americans are by-and-large still healthy enough that they won’t fall for it. A people who no longer want freedom don’t deserve it.

Dr. Michael Hurd is a psychotherapist, columnist and author of "Bad Therapy, Good Therapy (And How to Tell the Difference)" and "Grow Up America!" Visit his website at: www.DrHurd.com.

The views expressed represent those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors & publishers of Capitalism Magazine.

Capitalism Magazine often publishes articles we disagree with because we believe the article provides information, or a contrasting point of view, that may be of value to our readers.

Related articles

How Charlie Kirk Inspired a Generation

How Charlie Kirk Inspired a Generation

America was founded on the principle that we are free to disagree, and Charlie embodied that. Through respectful debate, he showed that people of all backgrounds and beliefs can stand firm in their convictions while still recognizing one another’s humanity. He lived that belief every single day.

Free Valjean

Free Valjean

Journalism does Valjean a further injustice when it focuses only on the bone and not the boot.

Freedom in a Post-Covid World

Freedom in a Post-Covid World

As we approach the semiquincentennial of the Declaration of Independence, we need to rethink the very foundations of freedom, its threats, and what we are going to do in response. 

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pin It on Pinterest