Lest anyone think this issue affects only lawyers, consider the following from the concurring opinion of Justice Kennedy: “Lawyers, like all those who practice a profession, have obligations to their calling which exceed their obligations to the state.”
Whether indigents accused of crimes should be provided with free counsel by the state; Whether a state should have the power to subpoena witnesses; and Whether there is a “right of privacy.”
Purchasers have a right to expect manufacturers to act with due care, but they are not entitled to omniscience or omnipotence.
Roe v. Wade is partly right in its result, but dangerously wrong in its reasoning. If Roe v. Wade is reconsidered, the Supreme Court should affirm abortion as a right that cannot be invaded or compromised.
Those who supported or voted for the Proposition deserve the consequences. So do the insurance companies. Unfortunately, the price will be paid by the innocent as well as the guilty.
Critical Legal Studies is an avowedly political movement among law school professors. The politics: socialism.
“[T]o compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves, is sinful and tyrannical . . .”
TAFOL board members are developing an op-ed article, in conjunction with the Ayn Rand Institute, opposing any effort to deny a woman the right to an abortion.
There has been no fundamental change as a result of the new conservative majority on the Supreme Court and there will not be, until basic philosophical premises are questioned
