Eminent Domain is Never the Solution

by | Jun 8, 2006 | POLITICS

Portland City Commissioner Randy Leonard wants the government to use its power of eminent domain to take property from one set of owners in SE Portland and transfer it to some others, in the hope that they will build an upscale supermarket. Commissioner Leonard believes that the lack of development on a four-acre parcel in […]

Portland City Commissioner Randy Leonard wants the government to use its power of eminent domain to take property from one set of owners in SE Portland and transfer it to some others, in the hope that they will build an upscale supermarket. Commissioner Leonard believes that the lack of development on a four-acre parcel in the Lents neighborhood is evidence of “market failure,” which justifies government intervention.

Many local property owners object, but Commissioner Leonard insists, “If you want your property values to go up, if you want business to rise, you have to allow condemnation.”

In fact, there are other ways to improve neighborhoods and increase property values. Throughout the 20th century, St. Louis revitalized some of its worst neighborhoods by transferring control of streets to local homeowners. In 1974 the residents of one deteriorating neighborhood formed a residential association and assumed management responsibility for the primary boulevard. They raised $40,000 to erect a gate that partially closed the street, giving owners more control. A block watch was started, crime decreased, and the association borrowed funds to improve the street and housing. The result was that property values doubled.

There’s no guarantee that this strategy would succeed in Lents, but it’s better than threatening property owners with condemnation. Empowering local homeowners by strengthening their property rights creates new investment opportunities, and investment is exactly what Portland needs.

John A. Charles, Jr. is President and CEO at Cascade Policy Institute, a Portland, Oregon based think tank.

The views expressed represent those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors & publishers of Capitalism Magazine.

Capitalism Magazine often publishes articles we disagree with because we believe the article provides information, or a contrasting point of view, that may be of value to our readers.

Related articles

Memorial Day: What We Owe Our Soldiers

Memorial Day: What We Owe Our Soldiers

To send soldiers into war without a clear self-defense purpose, and without providing them every possible protection, is a betrayal of their valor and a violation of their rights.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pin It on Pinterest