Democracy vs.The Essence of Liberty

by | Feb 11, 2006 | POLITICS

Mr. Frum’s ridicule of the imbecile appeasement philosophy guiding our foreign policy is bang on [From Ramallah, Harper’s First Big Test, David Frum, Jan. 31.]. However, by calling Western countries “democracies,” Mr. Frum appears to have bought into the insidious gimmick that allowed a vicious terrorist organization like Hamas to get elected. Ever since the […]

Mr. Frum’s ridicule of the imbecile appeasement philosophy guiding our foreign policy is bang on [From Ramallah, Harper’s First Big Test, David Frum, Jan. 31.]. However, by calling Western countries “democracies,” Mr. Frum appears to have bought into the insidious gimmick that allowed a vicious terrorist organization like Hamas to get elected.

Ever since the discrediting of communism, leftists have been championing a purposely vague thing called “democracy” as the essence of political freedom. But democracy in the true, historical sense means unlimited majority rule — which leads to mob rule, erosion of liberty and self-destruction, as in ancient Greece.

Aware of this problem, America’s Founding Fathers created a constitutional republic based on the principle of the individual’s right to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” regardless of majority vote.

Protecting individual rights is the essence of liberty. Leftists have downplayed individual rights, pushed “freedom to vote” as the essence of liberty, hoodwinking many into equating democracy with liberty. One major consequence has been the erosion of individual rights protection in Western countries such as Canada and America; another has been in foreign policy.

The West’s focus on pushing the “right to vote” instead of the protection of individual rights has led to the grotesque spectacle of enemies of liberty being voted into power.

Right-leaning intellectuals like Mr. Frum should help expose this fraud and choose their words more carefully.

Glenn Woiceshyn is a freelance writer, residing in Canada.

The views expressed represent those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors & publishers of Capitalism Magazine.

Capitalism Magazine often publishes articles we disagree with because we believe the article provides information, or a contrasting point of view, that may be of value to our readers.

Related articles

Zohran Mamdani’s “Democratic Socialist” Plans For New York City

Zohran Mamdani’s “Democratic Socialist” Plans For New York City

New York’s future does not lie in further centralization or state control. Its vitality has always derived from individual freedom, entrepreneurial energy, and the rule of law. The Big Apple became great because it allowed people to build, innovate, and prosper—not because government directed them.

Five Myths About Tariffs

Five Myths About Tariffs

Tariffs distort market signals that would otherwise lower costs, raise competition, and motivate reinvestment.

The Myth of The Medicare “Trust Fund”

The Myth of The Medicare “Trust Fund”

Using the phrase “Medicare’s trust fund” for any reason other than exposing its falsehood is grossly misleading. It implies there’s a pot of money available to fund Medicare, when no such pot exists.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pin It on Pinterest