President Bush’s Deadly Iranian Concession
In return for Iran's agreement to temporarily cease the work needed to produce a nuclear bomb, President Bush has agreed to allow Iran to buy civilian airplane parts, and to drop opposition to Iran's membership in the World Trade Organization. These concessions are exactly the same as the British government's concessions to Hitler in 1935. […]
In return for
In October of 1933 Hitler walked out of the World Disarmament Conference, and renounced the
Conceding the principle involved, the British granted Hitler’s claim to this right. They sent out negotiators to quibble over the amount. The result was an agreement to allow the Germans a navy that was 35% the size of the British fleet.
Well, what’s the problem? Such a navy could not beat
This was, of course, a surrender of everything. By accepting the 35% figure–which was proposed by Hitler–the British granted him the status of a legitimate leader. They accepted that he had a “right” to weapons on principle. They empowered Hitler’s aggressive generals and diminished the “moderates.” They told him that he could get away with murder. A few months later, he marched into the Rhineland unopposed; the British appealed to the
In concrete terms, the British concessions allowed him to re-tool his factories–a job that took years–so that he could start pumping out the weapons once he decided that he no longer had to ask. In allowing him to build even one ship, they granted him the factories and machine tools needed to build a thousand ships.
Every point of this applies directly to
By granting the Iranians time to negotiate, Mr. Bush is allowing them to build more underground facilities, and to take giant steps towards producing the bombs. He is empowering the hard-liners inside
Most of all, Mr. Bush has conceded
Perhaps Mr. Bush will do more before it is too late. Perhaps he will tacitly help
John David Lewis (website) is a Visiting Professor of Political Science, Duke University. He has been a Senior Research Scholar in History and Classics at the Social Philosophy and Policy Center, and an Anthem Fellow.
The views represent those of the author and not necessarily those of Capitalism Magazine.
RELATED ARTICLES
Privatization of Property: Importance of Fighting on Basis of Principles (Part 2 of 10)
The privatization of property is the most fundamental aspect of a procapitalist political program
Toward the Establishment of Laissez-Faire Capitalism (Part 1 of 10)
If a laissez-faire capitalist society is to be achieved, a political movement pursuing a long-range program will be necessary.
What a Plate of Huevos Rancheros Taught Me About Open Immigration
Immigration is our lifeblood and has made America great. Let’s keep America great. Let’s make America great again.
Memorial Day: What We Owe Our Soldiers
To send soldiers into war without a clear self-defense purpose, and without providing them every possible protection, is a betrayal of their valor and a violation of their rights.




