The Immorality of the “War on Drugs”

by | Oct 4, 1999 | Crime, POLITICS

Much fuss has been made recently about George W. Bush’s alleged drug usage. Apparently fearful of a scandal, Governor Bush has dodged the issue — with disturbingly Presidential style — creating a bigger scandal. Whether he has used drugs or not, he would have done better to follow the example of his New Mexican contemporary, […]

Much fuss has been made recently about George W. Bush’s alleged drug usage. Apparently fearful of a scandal, Governor Bush has dodged the issue — with disturbingly Presidential style — creating a bigger scandal. Whether he has used drugs or not, he would have done better to follow the example of his New Mexican contemporary, Governor Gary E. Johnson. During his first campaign, Mr. Johnson admitted to collegiate use of marijuana and cocaine, before anyone asked him about it, thus exposing the “skeleton” in the closet before anyone even knew the closet existed. And he won the election.

More important, however, than Gov. Johnson’s personal honesty, is his advocacy for a change in America’s drug policy. Pointing to the failure of Drug Czar Barry McCaffrey’s “war on drugs,” Mr. Johnson advocates the decriminalization of drug usage, and even legalization so that drugs could be sold for profit.

Legalizing drugs would destroy the drug cartels and smuggling rings that invariably involve crimes of theft, assault and murder. This is true, but more importantly, legalizing drugs would be a step towards destroying the principle of government control over your personal life.

The use of drugs is not, properly, a crime. It is immoral and self-destructive, to be sure, but it violates no one’s rights, and preventing it is not a proper government function — which is solely to protect individual rights.

Furthermore, prosecuting drug users does nothing to cure the basic problem, which is philosophical: the user’s desire to escape reality. The cure to drug abuse involves a rational education, a willingness to live in reality, and personal pride, elements that are conspicuously absent from today’s schools and culture, and actively discouraged by a government that attempts to destroy individual responsibility at every level. The same politicians and intellectuals who claim that the individual citizen is incompetent to make decisions about drug use, also declare that the individual is incompetent to control his own investment, health care, and education. At every level, the principle of individual responsibility is being destroyed by the insulting paternalism and power-lust of our increasingly statist government. In this environment of insulting paternalism, it is little wonder that many people turn to drugs to escape a reality they are told they are not responsible for.

Those behind Governor Bush’s evasiveness, and the so-called war on drugs, should look deeply into the lesson of Governor Johnson’s acceptance of the principle of individual responsibility. Not only is it moral, but it works.

Andrew Lewis is a senior writer for the Ayn Rand Institute in Irvine, Calif. The Institute promotes the philosophy of Ayn Rand, author of Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead.

The views expressed represent those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors & publishers of Capitalism Magazine.

Capitalism Magazine often publishes articles we disagree with because we believe the article provides information, or a contrasting point of view, that may be of value to our readers.

Related articles

Zohran Mamdani’s “Democratic Socialist” Plans For New York City

Zohran Mamdani’s “Democratic Socialist” Plans For New York City

New York’s future does not lie in further centralization or state control. Its vitality has always derived from individual freedom, entrepreneurial energy, and the rule of law. The Big Apple became great because it allowed people to build, innovate, and prosper—not because government directed them.

Five Myths About Tariffs

Five Myths About Tariffs

Tariffs distort market signals that would otherwise lower costs, raise competition, and motivate reinvestment.

The Myth of The Medicare “Trust Fund”

The Myth of The Medicare “Trust Fund”

Using the phrase “Medicare’s trust fund” for any reason other than exposing its falsehood is grossly misleading. It implies there’s a pot of money available to fund Medicare, when no such pot exists.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pin It on Pinterest