Hate Crime Laws Will Spawn Thought Police

by | Apr 1, 1999 | Crime

We should insist on the one principle that forms the foundation for the protection of all rights; that the purpose of law is to punish criminals for initiating force against others-not for holding bad ideas."

A proposed federal “hate crimes” law would give the government authority to declare certain ideas to be against the law, and should be rejected, said an Ayn Rand Institute senior writer.

“What will a ‘hate crimes’ law add? Despite its name, it is not ‘hatred’ as such that the proposed law targets,” said Robert W. Tracinski. “The real target is the criminal’s ideas. The proposed law declares that criminals motivated by a government-designated set of intolerable ideas — racism, sexism, religious sectarianism, anti-homosexuality — deserve special prosecution and additional punishment.”

Tracinski noted that proper criminal laws prohibit criminal actions of force and fraud, not “criminal” thought.

“A ‘hate crimes’ law would expand the law’s concern from criminal action to ‘criminal thought,'” argued Tracinski. “It would institute the premise that the purpose of our legal system is not to defend the rights of the victim, but to punish socially unacceptable ideas. This is a premise that should be abhorrent to a free society.”

Both the Left and the Right are already politicizing crime, said Tracinski, citing violent left-wing environmental protestors and right-wing anti-abortion activists who have received lighter sentences because of the political views of prosecutors and judges.

“Under such a politicized system, anything goes,” Tracinski said. “The entire criminal justice apparatus can be used as a political tool by whatever faction happens to be in power. Crimes can be whitewashed if done for the ‘correct’ political motives, while extra punishment can be meted out to those with ‘incorrect’ motives. Instead, we should insist on the one principle that forms the foundation for the protection of all rights; that the purpose of law is to punish criminals for initiating force against others-not for holding bad ideas.”

Copyright Ayn Rand Institute. All rights reserved. That the Ayn Rand Institute (ARI) has granted permission to Capitalism Magazine to republish this article, does not mean ARI necessarily endorses or agrees with the other content on this website.

The author is a contributing writer to Capitalism Magazine.

The views expressed above represent those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors and publishers of Capitalism Magazine. Capitalism Magazine sometimes publishes articles we disagree with because we think the article provides information, or a contrasting point of view, that may be of value to our readers.

Related articles

Decriminalize Drugs

Decriminalize Drugs

What drug prohibition did do is exactly what alcohol prohibition did a hundred years ago: increase conflict between police and citizens.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pin It on Pinterest