The necessary consequence of man’s right to life is his right to self-defense. In a civilized society, force may be used only in retaliation and only against those who initiate its use. All the reasons which make the initiation of physical force an evil, make the retaliatory use of physical force a moral imperative. – AYN RAND
On Sunday May 14, as many as 750,000 people, mostly mothers, gathered in Washington, D.C., as part of the Million Mom March. What a tragic collection of emotionally driven, self-righteous but utterly wrongheaded people. These “gun control supporters,” as...
Clint Eastwood should insist that his “Dirty Harry” movies be edited to remove all references to his famous .44 magnum. The words “Me and Smith and Wesson” have been eternally tainted by the gun-maker’s capitulation to the bureaucrats...
Families of Columbine High School shooting victims plan to sue the gun manufacturers. I have a better idea. Why don’t we sue the public schools? If not financially — then at least morally. Guns and bullets don’t kill people; bad ideas do. Unhealthy...
Question: In a proper society, individuals surrender to government the right to the use of retaliatory force. How does this line of reasoning applies to gun control. If it is moral and hence legal to own a weapon that can kill many quickly, where and what reasoning...
“Thank ‘My Sweet L-rd’ For Gun Laws.” A major newspaper opinion piece led with that headline. Ex-Beatle George Harrison, maintains the columnist, remains alive today only because of England’s tough anti-gun laws. A few weeks ago, an...
“So many racists, so little time.” Black Time magazine editor Jack E. White fired that shot at David Horowitz, the “conservative” head of an organization called The Center for the Study of Popular Culture. And get a load of White’s...
The gun control debate should be addressed as a debate over individual rights.
Latest pro-Capitalism goodness sent weekly to your email box.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.