Capitalism Brings Prosperity To All

by | Dec 28, 2014 | MARKETS

Long-term wealth can only be created by earning it: by trading value for value for win-win outcomes.

The long-standing argument of the Left is that the rich are getting richer and the poor poorer, presumably because the former “exploit” the latter. A lot of convincing-sounding statistics are marshalled in support of that claim, such as lower median incomes or hourly wages today versus in the past. These statistics can be manipulated in various ways (such as reporting short, outlier time periods versus trends over time), depending on what message one wants to convey. (An objective look at the long-term statistical trends confirms that median incomes today are actually higher than they were in the past. Please see the numbers here).

But even if we do not have income statistics on hand, mere observation confirms that people are economically better off than they were, say, 40 years ago. This is partly due to higher incomes today and partly due to the lower relative prices of many goods and services, thanks to freer markets in many parts of the world and a more global trade today. No, poverty has not been eliminated because we don’t have capitalism—which is the only system to eliminate poverty—but economic well-being has increased proportionally with economic freedom. Observe many of the Asian countries as examples. Even the Chinese have prospered, as the communist government there has increased economic, if not political, freedom. Closer to home, we can observe low-income families being able to afford many of the technology and other products that previously were within the reach of only the wealthy: TVs, cell phones, laptop computers, cars, better quality and/or quantity of clothes and food.

But even such concrete observations fail to persuade those leftists not open to reason; they cannot be reached, no matter how clear the argument. However, for those open to reason, the best way to show that everyone will prosper under a system of trade (the freer the better), is to explain how the principle of trade leads to improved human flourishing for all.

The rich cannot get richer by exploiting the poor; the rich can only get richer only if the poor also prosper. Wealth cannot be created by exploiting others—only by creating and trading values, for mutual benefit, by mutual consent. When the 99% (as per the claim of the Occupy movement that the richest 1% exploits the rest), shop at Wal-Mart or Costco, they aren’t being exploited. When we buy an iPhone, a Samsung Galaxy, or another smartphone, or a Sony or a Panasonic flat screen TV, we are not being exploited. When we negotiate a deal on a Hyundai or a Dodge, or any other car, we are not being exploited. When we buy goods or services, we do it to benefit ourselves, not because we are being forced to do so by ruthless producers who extort money from us.

And if the producers of the goods and services wanted to “exploit” us by charging “exorbitant” prices, there simply would not be enough buyers. If the 1% (or even the top 10%) traded just among themselves, their market would get saturated pretty quickly. It is trading with the mass consumer market that has enabled the Walton family, the owners of Costco, Apple, Samsung, Sony, Panasonic, Hyundai, Chrysler—and many others among the one per cent become wealthy. They have become wealthy, not by exploitation, but by producing and trading values that we want, to make our lives better.

To achieve the full benefits of trade, however, we need not just a little more economic freedom the typical mixed economy offers us today; we need a system of full political and economic freedom: laissez-faire capitalism. In such as system, individual rights, including property rights, are recognized and protected, all property is privately owned, and the government does not play any role in the economy (by regulating it, attempting to “stimulate” it, or “re-distributing” wealth from those who have produced it to those who have not).

It is time to reject the myth perpetuated by the Left that the wealthy are exploiting the rest of us for their own benefit. While criminals (scammers, pyramid schemers, and the like) temporarily looting others’ money are possible and must be punished, long-term wealth can only be created by earning it: by trading value for value for win-win outcomes. So instead of demonizing the wealth creators—the producers of values, let’s be grateful for their production and advocate a social system that makes increased prosperity possible for everybody: full capitalism.

 

Jaana Woiceshyn taught business ethics and competitive strategy for over 30 years at the Haskayne School of Business, University of Calgary, Canada, where she is now an emerita professor.How to Be Profitable and Moral” is her first solo-authored book. Visit her website at profitableandmoral.com.

The views expressed above represent those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors and publishers of Capitalism Magazine. Capitalism Magazine sometimes publishes articles we disagree with because we think the article provides information, or a contrasting point of view, that may be of value to our readers.

Related articles

Why Do Business Leaders Appease Their Enemies?

Why Do Business Leaders Appease Their Enemies?

The fundamental reason for appeasing the critics of business is that company executives lack the moral argument for defense. As Ayn Rand argues in ‘The Sanction of The Victims,’ most business leaders have accepted the moral code of altruism.

Bitcoin Bests $100,000

Bitcoin Bests $100,000

If Bitcoin is someday supplanted by another digital asset offering indisputable improvements, its foundational role in seeding and anchoring the cryptocurrency asset class — and in driving trillions of dollars of investment into similar and related assets and enterprises — will remain as significant, if not more so, than its contributions to the present.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pin It on Pinterest