Why should business defend itself—even if it is for the right to sell super-sized sodas?

by | Jun 20, 2012 | Business

New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg announced recently a plan to ban large sodas (16 oz. or more) from New York City’s restaurants, movie theaters, and street carts, in an effort to combat obesity.It has created a wide-spread backlash among businesses—rightly so—led by Coca-Cola and MacDonald’s. They Tweeted, respectively: “Unlike @MikeBloomberg, @CocaColaCo thinks #NewYorkers can make […]

New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg announced recently a plan to ban large sodas (16 oz. or more) from New York City’s restaurants, movie theaters, and street carts, in an effort to combat obesity.It has created a wide-spread backlash among businesses—rightly so—led by Coca-Cola and MacDonald’s. They Tweeted, respectively: “Unlike @MikeBloomberg, @CocaColaCo thinks #NewYorkers can make their own choices about what they drink. #NYC deserves better.” And: “@MikeBloomberg We trust our customers to make the choices that are best for them.”

Although Coke, MacDonald’s and NYC businesses stand to lose some money if they cannot sell large sodas, that is not the most fundamental issue here—being able to trade freely is.

Government dictating to business what size soft drinks they can sell violates the individual rights of these companies. And once the principle of liberty has been compromised, the door is open to further erosion of freedom.

If the government can ban sales of large sodas, it can also ban sales of foods and other products it does not deem healthy. And the next step is to dictate what products we must buy in order to stay healthy or lose weight.

Why can’t we tolerate any initiation of force by government on business, even when it seems to be for a good cause such as reducing obesity? Freedom from physical force, whether initiated by criminals or government, is essential for survival and flourishing of individuals and businesses. For counter examples, think of statist regimes (such as Syria, Cuba, Iran, North Korea) and the miserable existence of their citizens.

It is freedom, including free competition—not government’s use of force—that makes it possible for business to thrive: to come up with new, innovative, cheaper products and maximize long-term profitability. It is freedom—not government’s use of force—that makes it possible for individuals to make choices that benefit their lives (and to be responsible for those choices that do not).

Therefore business, and we as individuals, should protest vigorously when the government oversteps the boundaries of its only proper role: protection of the rights of individuals—including those of business.

Jaana Woiceshyn taught business ethics and competitive strategy for over 30 years at the Haskayne School of Business, University of Calgary, Canada, where she is now an emerita professor.How to Be Profitable and Moral” is her first solo-authored book. Visit her website at profitableandmoral.com.

The views expressed represent those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors & publishers of Capitalism Magazine.

Capitalism Magazine often publishes articles we disagree with because we believe the article provides information, or a contrasting point of view, that may be of value to our readers.

Related articles

Why Do Business Leaders Appease Their Enemies?

Why Do Business Leaders Appease Their Enemies?

The fundamental reason for appeasing the critics of business is that company executives lack the moral argument for defense. As Ayn Rand argues in ‘The Sanction of The Victims,’ most business leaders have accepted the moral code of altruism.

Walgreens, Mass Closures, and the Power of Incentives

Walgreens, Mass Closures, and the Power of Incentives

Despite Walgreens being ranked as one of America’s most trusted brands, with a rich history dating back to 1901, 500 stores are slated to shut their doors in 2025 with more closures to come in the years following.

Free Markets Help Workers Flourish

Free Markets Help Workers Flourish

The fundamental principle that we need to recognize to help all workers flourish, ignored by most labor unions and governments alike, is freedom.

Should Business Be Selfish?

Should Business Be Selfish?

Selfishness guides business to trade value for value with all parties – wages for employees’ productivity, products and services for customers’ payment, payment for suppliers’ products, and so on – by mutual consent, for mutual benefit, with no deception or fraud. This is the only way business can maximize long-term profits – and the reason it should be selfish.

Business Schools Undermine Wealth Creation

Business Schools Undermine Wealth Creation

Students should be reminded that money-making is not an evil endeavor when done ethically and efficiently, and productive pursuits do not need to be tasked with tackling societal ills.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pin It on Pinterest