Robert Fulford’s Confusions Over Capitalism

by | Mar 24, 2006 | POLITICS

As long as people regard altruism as good, they will oppose or feel guilty about capitalism.

Robert Fulford conveys confusion about the meaning of capitalism [“Capitalism’s guilt edge”, National Post, March 25, 2006].

To suggest that poverty in China proves “capitalism works imperfectly” implies China practices capitalism. But capitalism, as defined by its greatest champion, Ayn Rand, “is a social system based on the recognition of individual rights, including property rights, in which all property is privately owned.” China is a collectivist dictatorship that permits some private enterprise–a far cry from pure capitalism.

Likewise, to suggest that capitalism failed in the 1930s evades the well documented anti-capitalist policies of the U.S. government that caused the depression.

But the most important question raised by Fulford is why capitalism is despised despite its proven ability to improve our lives. Fulford only hints at the answer by tying capitalism to “selfishness.” As Rand pointed out in such books as Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal, capitalism is based on the morality of “rational self-interest” (one of today’s most subverted and misunderstood concepts); but our culture predominantly champions self-sacrifice or altruism as the moral ideal.

As long as people regard altruism as good, they will oppose or feel guilty about capitalism. It’s too bad because capitalism–properly understood and practiced–could improve our lives immensely and eliminate many of the world’s problems that are easily attributed to the politics of statism, which is based on the morality of altruism.

Glenn Woiceshyn is a freelance writer, residing in Canada.

The views expressed represent those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors & publishers of Capitalism Magazine.

Capitalism Magazine often publishes articles we disagree with because we believe the article provides information, or a contrasting point of view, that may be of value to our readers.

Related articles

Zohran Mamdani’s “Democratic Socialist” Plans For New York City

Zohran Mamdani’s “Democratic Socialist” Plans For New York City

New York’s future does not lie in further centralization or state control. Its vitality has always derived from individual freedom, entrepreneurial energy, and the rule of law. The Big Apple became great because it allowed people to build, innovate, and prosper—not because government directed them.

Five Myths About Tariffs

Five Myths About Tariffs

Tariffs distort market signals that would otherwise lower costs, raise competition, and motivate reinvestment.

The Myth of The Medicare “Trust Fund”

The Myth of The Medicare “Trust Fund”

Using the phrase “Medicare’s trust fund” for any reason other than exposing its falsehood is grossly misleading. It implies there’s a pot of money available to fund Medicare, when no such pot exists.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pin It on Pinterest