Alan Greenspan: Puppet or Puppet Master?

by | Feb 3, 2001 | POLITICS

Alan Greenspan’s about-face on interest rates and tax cuts might have you wondering if he is simply reacting to his new Commander-in-Chief, or if he is seeing how much he can manipulate the economy. Under Clinton, he was an outspoken opponent of tax cuts–which was what Clinton wanted him to be–and the architect of interest […]

Alan Greenspan’s about-face on interest rates and tax cuts might have you wondering if he is simply reacting to his new Commander-in-Chief, or if he is seeing how much he can manipulate the economy. Under Clinton, he was an outspoken opponent of tax cuts–which was what Clinton wanted him to be–and the architect of interest rate rises. And yet, in the last thirty days he has reversed his position on tax cuts and slashed a large chunk from the interest rate increases he had instituted.

Both changes coincided with the change of Administrations and the end of the economic growth that he had been “worried about” for some time. Along with Clinton, he opposed tax cuts; along with Bush he endorses them.

Some analysts have suggested that he changed direction to curry favor President Bush, but as economist Richard Salsman noted, Greenspan’s “policy at the Fed has caused a near recession.”1

In changing policies, Greenspan may only be trying to stave off the death of the economy and his reputation. One is tempted to ask, “Is Greenspan the Puppet Master, changing his policies to control the economy, or is he the puppet, dancing on the strings of political expediency?”

In fact, this is a false alternative. Both puppet and master are dependent on each other. Greenspan has revealed himself as a “second-hander;” a man not of principles but of power–one who chooses his actions according to others, either those who might control him or those that he might control.

This is the deeper explanation for his actions. He is not the brilliant economic strategist who can identify the right policy for the right time. Rather, he is a cipher whose sole concerns are appeasing those he cannot control.

This is a dangerous man to have controlling our economic future.

1 “Richard Salsman Interview”, The Andrew Lewis Show, 1/28/01

Andrew Lewis is a senior writer for the Ayn Rand Institute in Irvine, Calif. The Institute promotes the philosophy of Ayn Rand, author of Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead.

The views expressed represent those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors & publishers of Capitalism Magazine.

Capitalism Magazine often publishes articles we disagree with because we believe the article provides information, or a contrasting point of view, that may be of value to our readers.

Related articles

Zohran Mamdani’s “Democratic Socialist” Plans For New York City

Zohran Mamdani’s “Democratic Socialist” Plans For New York City

New York’s future does not lie in further centralization or state control. Its vitality has always derived from individual freedom, entrepreneurial energy, and the rule of law. The Big Apple became great because it allowed people to build, innovate, and prosper—not because government directed them.

Five Myths About Tariffs

Five Myths About Tariffs

Tariffs distort market signals that would otherwise lower costs, raise competition, and motivate reinvestment.

The Myth of The Medicare “Trust Fund”

The Myth of The Medicare “Trust Fund”

Using the phrase “Medicare’s trust fund” for any reason other than exposing its falsehood is grossly misleading. It implies there’s a pot of money available to fund Medicare, when no such pot exists.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pin It on Pinterest