Are We Equal?

Are women equal to men? Are Jews equal to gentiles? Are blacks equal to Italians, Irish, Polish and other white people? The answer is probably a big fat no, and the pretense or assumption that we are equal — or should be equal — is foolhardy and creates mischief. Let’s look at it.

Male geniuses outnumber female geniuses 7-to-1. Female intelligence is packed much closer to the middle of the bell curve, whereas men’s intelligence has far greater variability. That means that though there are many more male geniuses, there are also many more male idiots. The latter might partially explain why more men are in jail than women.

Watch any Saturday afternoon college basketball game and ask yourself the question fixated in the minds of liberals everywhere: “Does this look like America?” Among the 10 players on the court, at best there might be two white players. If you want to see the team’s white players, you must look at the bench. A Japanese or Chinese player is close to being totally out of the picture, even on the bench. Professional basketball isn’t much better, with 80 percent of the players being black, but at least there’s a Chinese player. Professional football isn’t much better, with blacks being 65 percent. In both sports, blacks are among the highest-paid players and have the highest number of awards for excellence. Blacks who trace their ancestry to West Africa, including black Americans, hold more than 95 percent of the top times in sprinting.

By contrast, blacks are only 2 percent of the NHL’s ice hockey players. But don’t fret about black NHL underrepresentation. State underrepresentation is worse. Most U.S. professional hockey players were born in Minnesota, followed by Massachusetts. Not a single U.S. professional hockey player can boast of having been born and raised in Hawaii, Mississippi or Louisiana. Any way we cut it, there is simply no racial proportionality or diversity in professional basketball, football and hockey.

A more emotionally charged question is whether we have equal intelligence. Take Jews, for example. They are only 3 percent of the U.S. population. Half-baked theories of racial proportionality would predict that 3 percent of U.S. Nobel laureates are Jews, but that’s way off the mark. Jews constitute a whopping 39 percent of American Nobel Prize winners. At the international level, the disparity is worse. Jews are not even 1 percent of the world’s population, but they constitute 20 percent of the world’s Nobel Prize winners.

There are many other inequalities and disproportionalities. Asian-Americans routinely score the highest on the math portion of the SAT, whereas blacks score the lowest. Men are 50 percent of the population, and so are women; yet men are struck by lightning six times as often as women. I’m personally wondering what whoever is in charge of lightning has against men. Population statistics for South Dakota, Iowa, Maine, Montana and Vermont show that not even 1 percent of their respective populations is black. By contrast, in Georgia, Alabama and Mississippi, blacks are overrepresented in terms of their percentages in the general population. Pima Indians of Arizona have the world’s highest known diabetes rates. Prostate cancer is nearly twice as common among black men as white men. Cervical cancer rates are five times higher among Vietnamese women in the U.S. than among white women.

Soft-minded and sloppy-thinking academics, lawyers and judges harbor the silly notion that but for the fact of discrimination, we’d be proportionately distributed by race across incomes, education, occupations and other outcomes. There is absolutely no evidence anywhere, at any time, that proportionality is the norm anywhere on earth; however, much of our thinking, many of our laws and much of our public policy are based upon proportionality’s being the norm. Maybe this vision is held because people believe that equality in fact is necessary for equality before the law. But the only requirement for equality before the law is that one is a human being.

  • Edward Cline

    Egalitarianism is an evil ideology that seeks to erase value judgments not only among men but now also among ideas. To an advocate of egalitarianism, all political ideologies that are collectivist (and even totalitarian) in nature, should be exempt from moral judgment, such as communism,fascism, Islam, and socialism and should not be “negatively” criticized. Not exempted from an egalitarian’s judgment is capitalism.

  • Frederick Thornton

    Wow, There is so much oversimplification in this article it is hard to know where to begin. Do blacks dominate sports because they are athletically better, or is it because of the brutality of the slave trade that bred out any physical weaknesses.?
    Intelligence is not the cause of creativity and innovation, it is only half of the equation when it comes to the human mind. Creativity and innovation are products of the intuitive mind, the feeling mind and not the thinking rational mind.
    And better hockey players will come from places that have a cold winter, its required to be able to play the sport. These arguments are typical of of the laissez faire capitalist. They appeal to the simple minded.

  • Edson Mena

    The point of the article just flew right over your head as you were trying to engage in humor by mymicry. The insistence in equality of opportunity, or equality before the law is completely different from equality of outcome. The previous is laudable while the latter is contemptible. Don’t look to outcomes as evidence of equality, because we are different in many respects.

  • jizzajones

    Yes, we are different…but how are we different and what is the cause of those differences? This is where there is significant divergence. There are those who would lead you to believe that the source of difference is the fundamental genetic difference between races. Once you accept this, the stage is set for the structural stratification of races and the rights and opportunities that go with it….that is a dangerous slippery slope.