Yet More Tears for Africa

by | Sep 27, 2002 | Africa, WORLD

In a report in the Washington Times, the Bush administration said in August that it no longer considers President Robert Mugabe to be the legitimate leader of Zimbabwe and called upon “the body politic” of his country “to go forward and correct that situation.” According to the Times: Mr. Mugabe has ordered the takeover of […]

In a report in the Washington Times, the Bush administration said in August that it no longer considers President Robert Mugabe to be the legitimate leader of Zimbabwe and called upon “the body politic” of his country “to go forward and correct that situation.”

According to the Times:

Mr. Mugabe has ordered the takeover of thousands of white-owned farms, which are being handed over to his political supporters, former independence war veterans, military officers and peasants.

The farm disruptions have deeply reduced agricultural output that typically feeds not only Zimbabwe but also its neighbors. Some white farmers have refused to leave their farms and were arrested last week.

Nevertheless, the Bush administration plans to send 190,000 tons of emergency food aid to southern Africa in addition to 310,000 tons of food the US already contributes to the region.

Why on earth would the Bush administration send food to mitigate Mugabe’s politically inspired food shortage? Any subsequent famine will be due directly to Mugabe’s banditry, and yet our government sees fit to send taxpayer-purchased food to lessen the effect of his reign, even as it calls for his ouster.

This policy of sending food subsidies to failed regimes does nothing to promote US national interests. Furthermore, by lessening the effect of Mugabe’s banditry, US policy actually undercuts the rights of Zimbabwean landholders and uses the fruits of Americans’ labor to prop up Mugabe’s evil regime. It is not the place of the United States to cover for the mistakes of a thuggish dictator with no concept of private property. If Mugabe thinks that food can be produced without the farmers who made the farms productive in the first place, then let him and his cronies feel the pain of that decision in their bellies.

The appropriate US policy would be to simply offer refuge status to the affected farmers. Let these farmers come to the US to grow crops in Iowa or Kansas, secure in the knowledge that their property is safe from seizure.

It is sad to say, but Africa is still far from entering the civilized world. For a continent as rich in resources as it is, it still is impoverished in the one realm that matters–the realm of ideas.

Nicholas Provenzo is founder and Chairman of the Center for the Advancement of Capitalism.

The views expressed represent those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors & publishers of Capitalism Magazine.

Capitalism Magazine often publishes articles we disagree with because we believe the article provides information, or a contrasting point of view, that may be of value to our readers.

Related articles

Optimism Is Back in Argentina

Optimism Is Back in Argentina

President Javier Milei’s clear victory on Sunday, October 26, over the opposition in the midterm elections, where he obtained almost 41% of the vote to 31% of the Peronists, was greeted with market euphoria.

Milei’s Argentina Goes to Vote October 26

Milei’s Argentina Goes to Vote October 26

or Milei to continue the vast reform agenda that Argentina needs, his party (or his party and those allied) will have to get a third of the seats plus one in either house—enough to prevent the opposition from overriding presidential vetoes. 

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pin It on Pinterest