Most of us pursue self-interest every day: we eat nutritious food, engage in productive work (to have a purpose and to make a living), look after our health, enjoy recreation and entertainment, spend time with friends and loved ones, and go to the mall to buy things we need and want. Business firms also pursue the self-interest of their owners by producing and trading goods or services to maximize profits. People and businesses pursue self-interest in order to survive and flourish. Yet, the majority of people consciously reject the idea that self-interest is moral, creating a conflict between their moral beliefs and daily actions. They associate being moral with altruism, always putting others’ interests first (which is the true meaning of altruism as opposed to kindness or benevolence). Being selfish—pursuing your self-interest—is considered evil and immoral. Most philosophers and religions have promoted this view, and few have ever questioned it.
I want to challenge altruism as destructive and incompatible with all aspects of human survival and flourishing, including business.
Altruism’s appeal is the comforting thought that it is the duty of others to help you based on your need (as opposed to you depending on voluntary charity); you are not responsible for providing for yourself. Others are supposed to give up their interests for your sake. If you are hungry, it is the duty of others to feed you, or give up their own meal. If you need clothing, others must provide it. If you need a job, someone must hire you—not based on your qualifications but on your need for a job. And if your competitors are better at winning customers than you, they must sacrifice their self-interest buy sending customers your way.
The destructiveness of altruism lies in its condemnation of a fundamental requirement of human survival and flourishing as evil. If we systematically reject self-interest, we will die—and then we could sacrifice for others no more. This realization was not lost on the famous proponent of altruism, John Stuart Mill. He said that we should only take for ourselves the bare minimum that would maintain our strength to keep serving others. While most people do not take altruism literally or follow Mill’s advice, they still consider altruism a moral ideal—a moral ideal that can never be even approximated and therefore a constant source of guilt.
When business people accept altruism as the moral ideal, it becomes a powerful weapon in the hands of those who attack business, such as environmentalists, various advocates of “social justice” from anti-poverty groups to the Occupy movement, leftist politicians and intellectuals. Business by definition must pursue the self-interest of its owners. If it did not, it would not be able to survive and flourish on the long term. If those running a business firm accepted altruism as the moral standard, they could never defend themselves against the critics demanding more sacrifice of profits. The managers would have no consistent guideline do determine when, to whom, and how much to sacrifice and when to focus on profit making.
If a business firm is to survive and flourish—to maximize long-term profits—those in charge of it must reject altruism and embrace, defend, and apply the morality of self-interest: rational egoism.
Latest posts by Jaana Woiceshyn (see all)
- Fraud is Not an Ethical Dilemma: Avoiding Scams Like the Wells Fargo Fake Accounts - 2016.11.29
- Trump: Wrong On Free Trade - 2016.11.21
- The Corporate Social Responsibility “Package Deal” - 2016.11.21
- Bad Business: The Moral Sanction of the Regulatory State - 2016.11.19
- Laissez-Faire Capitalism: The Solution to the Oil and Gas Unemployment Crisis - 2016.11.18